NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
+184%
2.142 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
576
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
