NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 38W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+1917%
5.468 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro 410
136
RTX A500 Embedded
+1832%
2628
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
38W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
