NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+1373%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
38W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
