NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2945%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
38W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
