NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+174%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
16
256
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
