NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+631%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
