NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+582%
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
16
256
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
40W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
