NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+9158%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
56
48
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU102
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
