NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
9168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
A10G
+29085%
31.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
72
48
Shading Units
9216
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA102
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
