Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and a Desktop platform GPU: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 +6647%
29.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2024
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40
Professional
Type
Desktop
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1920 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
36 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
455.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.15 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.15 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
AD103
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
AD103-175-K1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy