NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000M
+29%
0.422 TFLOPS
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK107
N12P-Q3
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
