Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2175MHz vs 1440MHz)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +159%
26.73 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Tesla
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
160bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
48
3584
Shading Units
6144
224
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
64
224
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net