NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+2245%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR4
3072bit
Memory Bus
512bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
159W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
