NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+539%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.3
