NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+5275%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR4
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
165W
TDP
89W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
