Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 678.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2610MHz vs 1440MHz)
10496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti +612%
73.5 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1325 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
678.4GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
110
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
14080
224
TMUs
440
96
ROPs
144
224
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
375.8 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1148 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
73.50 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.50 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1148 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-225-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy