AMD P30PH vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P30PH and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1531MHz vs 1206MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 268.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P30PH
4.94 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+122%
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2016
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
2100 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
268.8GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
2048
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 20
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
