AMD P30PH vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P30PH and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P30PH
+893%
4.94 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2100 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
268.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 20
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
