AMD P30PH vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P30PH and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Lower TDP (180W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1785MHz vs 1206MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 268.8GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P30PH
4.94 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+1121%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1206 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2100 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
268.8GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
2048
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
154.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
4.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
4.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
308.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
180W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Polaris 20
GPU Name
GH100
-
-
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Hopper
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
80 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
