NVIDIA P106 100 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P106 100
+337%
4.375 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
RV770
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
