NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1670MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+464%
10.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Feb 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1024
200
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
