NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
+27310%
10.69 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Jan 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
25
SM Count
2
3200
Shading Units
16
200
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
0 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT218
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
