Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +2067%
10.77 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
-
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
320
200
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
RV670
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net