Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q +2475%
6.18 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
96
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
GA107
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net