NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
+60%
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
RV730
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
