NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
+226%
0.784 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1519 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
2
96
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GP108
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
