NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+1167%
3.041 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
TU116
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
