Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2175MHz
Lower TDP (130W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +8%
26.73 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
8192
Shading Units
6144
512
TMUs
192
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
130W
850 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net