Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+6%
24.58 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
8192
Shading Units
5120
512
TMUs
160
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
100W
850 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
