Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +185%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
8.602 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
4096
512
TMUs
256
512
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
275W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net