Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 560.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+122%
24.58 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
11.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
8192
Shading Units
3584
512
TMUs
192
512
ROPs
80
128
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
250W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
