Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+2802%
15.56 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
0 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
256
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
