Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2175MHz
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+71%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
4096
Shading Units
6144
256
TMUs
192
256
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
