Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 143.9GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2815MHz
Lower TDP (107W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+84%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
107W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
