Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 235 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3936 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+4194%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 235 OEM
0.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
160
256
TMUs
8
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.100 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.200 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
248.0 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Caicos
-
GPU Variant
Caicos XT
(215-0804070)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.37 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0
