Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock1226MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +142%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT
4.394 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net