Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+44%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520
7.373 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 12
-
GPU Variant
Navi 12
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
