Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2004
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
12
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.19 billion
Unknown
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0
