Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320
10.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER
(215-0894144)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
