Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +256%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net