Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+5751%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
