Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+516%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1024
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A
