ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1900 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 30.08GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
M6x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
470 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
30.08GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
-
Shading Units
3072
12
TMUs
96
12
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M68
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
