NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+985%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2020
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
108
1024
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
192
32
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
