NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+1052%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tegra
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
32
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
