NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1150MHz vs 921MHz)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+211%
0.736 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tegra
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
20 nm
Process Size
22 nm
2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.0
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
