NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU vs Intel Arc 140V
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU and 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2050MHz vs 921MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Intel Arc 140V
+1637%
4.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2024
Tegra
Generation
Battlemage
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
640 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
921 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
LPDDR5x
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
0
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.6 GPixel/s
14.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
471.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
235.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.1 TFLOPS
7.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
-
Power Connectors
Graphics Processor
GM20B
GPU Name
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
TM660M-A2
GPU Variant
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Xe2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
20 nm
Process Size
3 nm
2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12.2
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
5.3
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
