Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 131% (1650MHz vs 715MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+361%
2.534 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260X
0.549 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Dec 2015
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
620 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
715 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
