Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2034MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M
+187%
7.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2021
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
11.06 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
