Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1650MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+111%
2.534 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Feb 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1
(N17S-G5-A1)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
